|

Tennis Analysis 2009 – Part 3

agassiiWe previously looked at the year 2009 for ATP tennis, but now we will look at how well the model has gone over the past 5 years (since 2005). Note that this is based on head to head betting only and not set betting. Results are found below with commentary under that.

Prob#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.118942.1% $4,778.43 -$3,399.26 -71.1%
0.10.2786688.7% $42,333.89 -$9,007.09 -21.3%
0.20.3134924117.9% $104,173.93 -$14,307.25 -13.7%
0.30.4169949329.0% $160,272.71 $19,313.19 12.1%
0.40.5182168637.7% $207,648.29 $9,381.66 4.5%
0.50.6151972948.0% $221,076.40 $14,297.35 6.5%
0.60.7136179858.6% $213,864.96 $15,502.00 7.2%
0.70.8104473170.0% $197,167.38 $5,937.79 3.0%
0.80.966654281.4% $171,479.46 $13,638.93 8.0%
0.9127425292.0% $99,914.04 $2,128.72 2.1%
TOTAL10708454442.4% $1,422,709.49 $53,486.02 3.8%
Odds#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
11.4116597683.8% $248,013.75 $15,401.77 6.2%
1.41.7139091365.7% $228,813.64 $5,914.79 2.6%
1.72105159156.2% $148,511.56 $11,403.99 7.7%
22.2580638948.3% $112,618.37 -$955.62-0.8%
2.252.583334641.5% $110,795.00 $8,389.34 7.6%
2.53130150438.7% $163,327.65 $16,543.76 10.1%
34147343329.4% $164,852.18 $3,537.74 2.1%
46123126921.9% $125,653.19 $4,389.55 3.5%
6108419811.7% $72,406.08 -$8,160.46 -11.3%
1050583254.3% $46,392.68 -$1,653.46 -3.6%
TOTAL10674454442.6% $1,421,384.12 $54,811.39 3.9%
Overlay#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.052326138759.6% $139,661.16 $1,851.31 1.3%
0.050.1174787750.2% $193,474.74 $1,648.74 0.9%
0.10.15130563648.7% $181,582.29 $10,205.66 5.6%
0.150.2101145344.8% $161,054.98 $12,461.96 7.7%
0.20.2574927737.0% $121,118.73 $231.770.2%
0.250.354620537.5% $88,346.28 $7,665.85 8.7%
0.30.488726830.2% $152,444.45 -$2,117.70 -1.4%
0.40.695027428.8% $176,300.91 $21,728.61 12.3%
0.6169512217.6% $129,348.98 -$5,250.53 -4.1%
15487459.2% $78,355.93 $6,081.39 7.8%
TOTAL10703454442.5% $1,421,688.45 $54,507.07 3.8%
SP Rules
Prob#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.100#DIV/0!$-$-#DIV/0!
0.10.200#DIV/0!$-$-#DIV/0!
0.20.300#DIV/0!$-$-#DIV/0!
0.30.473318224.8% $112,098.68 $19,377.83 17.3%
0.40.560019532.5% $119,527.89 $8,012.63 6.7%
0.50.6120956146.4% $212,722.00 $14,413.51 6.8%
0.60.797155256.8% $197,439.10 $15,505.46 7.9%
0.70.864744468.6% $171,826.84 $6,641.81 3.9%
0.80.937630079.8% $139,517.42 $12,795.50 9.2%
0.91968184.4% $52,421.80 $919.641.8%
TOTAL4632231550.0% $1,005,553.73 $77,666.36 7.7%
Odds#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
11.443336684.5% $151,740.47 $13,919.51 9.2%
1.41.788758866.3% $205,394.41 $6,139.88 3.0%
1.7276043056.6% $139,799.52 $11,302.77 8.1%
22.2556827648.6% $105,100.18 -$545.53-0.5%
2.252.533714843.9% $76,937.10 $8,671.25 11.3%
2.5344018341.6% $104,639.56 $13,928.57 13.3%
3468920930.3% $124,645.22 $5,210.46 4.2%
4644510022.5% $79,886.37 $3,893.37 4.9%
610621117.7% $14,269.76 $2,596.95 18.2%
105011436.4% $3,141.15 $12,549.13 399.5%
TOTAL4632231550.0% $1,005,553.73 $77,666.36 7.7%
Overlay#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.0500#DIV/0!$-$-#DIV/0!
0.050.1102366865.3% $165,888.52 $4,815.73 2.9%
0.10.1567743063.5% $143,334.75 $7,920.38 5.5%
0.150.247829561.7% $119,735.82 $11,919.80 10.0%
0.20.2528915352.9% $78,125.17 $2,054.73 2.6%
0.250.342418042.5% $81,424.72 $6,107.46 7.5%
0.30.464723336.0% $136,233.56 -$563.54-0.4%
0.40.662023237.4% $149,858.75 $23,924.03 16.0%
0.6134810028.7% $94,992.44 $10,412.65 11.0%
151242419.4% $35,373.86 $11,661.25 33.0%
TOTAL4630231550.0% $1,004,967.59 $78,252.50 7.8%
Surface
Hard156277749.7% $322,145.31 $20,833.36 6.5%
Clay172390552.5% $395,111.49 $41,832.59 10.6%
Grass49924849.7% $123,072.38 $154.180.1%
I.Hard58627446.8% $111,400.82 $12,675.63 11.4%
Carpet26111142.5% $53,351.54 $2,642.79 5.0%
TOTAL4631231550.0% $1,005,081.54 $78,138.55 7.8%
Overlay Prob 20-30%Overlay#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.051444229.2% $1,131.33 $249.7722.1%
0.050.11312720.6% $3,010.53 -$382.22-12.7%
0.10.151162420.7% $4,166.89 -$355.90-8.5%
0.150.21052120.0% $5,040.75 -$259.84-5.2%
0.20.25921516.3% $5,331.18 -$1,175.84 -22.1%
0.250.3782228.2% $5,453.54 $2,077.12 38.1%
0.30.41542818.2% $12,485.84 -$621.88-5.0%
0.40.61923317.2% $19,334.24 -$53.75-0.3%
0.61192168.3% $23,909.66 -$9,593.68 -40.1%
1100145139.0% $24,309.98 -$4,191.06 -17.2%
TOTAL134924117.9% $104,173.93 -$14,307.25 -13.7%
Overlay Prob 30-40%Overlay#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.052217634.4% $2,714.04 $86.493.2%
0.050.12558633.7% $9,527.28 $427.974.5%
0.10.151926935.9% $10,927.58 $1,806.14 16.5%
0.150.21464329.5% $11,077.38 -$253.71-2.3%
0.20.251523724.3% $13,927.74 -$2,131.53 -15.3%
0.250.31213730.6% $12,787.59 $1,170.30 9.2%
0.30.41934824.9% $24,011.70 -$1,173.60 -4.9%
0.40.61894624.3% $28,301.25 $1,007.25 3.6%
0.611553522.6% $29,241.76 $4,439.75 15.2%
1100751621.3% $17,756.39 $13,934.12 78.5%
TOTAL169949329.0% $160,272.71 $19,313.19 12.1%
Overlay Prob 40-50%Overlay#Bets#Wins%Wins$Bet$Profit%ROI
00.0531013944.8% $5,897.26 $76.591.3%
0.050.12668732.7% $14,222.59 -$3,138.70 -22.1%
0.10.1526011042.3% $22,166.91 $1,339.14 6.0%
0.150.22158640.0% $23,488.48 $1,049.76 4.5%
0.20.251706940.6% $22,345.16 $2,042.23 9.1%
0.250.31205041.7% $18,121.89 $3,212.80 17.7%
0.30.41796134.1% $31,314.07 $424.351.4%
0.40.61825329.1% $37,777.43 -$845.29-2.2%
0.61822530.5% $20,660.10 $4,466.18 21.6%
110037616.2% $11,654.40 $754.606.5%
TOTAL182168637.7% $207,648.29 $9,381.66 4.5%

A lot of things can be discussed here. Note that because of the “Federer Factor”, betting on tennis players with probabilities under 30% was not profitable. Likewise, bets on players with odds of 6.00 or more was not profitable, and most likely for the same reason. This same reason once again means that it is hard to distinguish between profitable bets for the overlays, as low probability players with large odds are also most likely to have a large overlay.

Better to analyse the results under SP Rules, which looks at a 5% min overlay for all probabilities greater or equal to 50%, and a minimum 25% overlay for all probabilities between 30 and 50%.

Here we get some good results. A total of 7.7% ROI is very very good. Profits are found virtually amongst all probability and odds ranges. Similarly, all overlays had a good profit. It is good to see that the %ROI increased as the overlay increased which is what we would want.

As expected grass court only barely managed to make a profit, whilst all other surfaces did very well. Previously in the forum we talked about grass court and how favourites are more likely to win. Bets perhaps should be adjusted for this, we will talk about this more soon.

When looking at the near bet probabilities of 20% to 30%, we can see that no minimum overlays are profitable. Best to leave all these alone. Even the very high 100%+ overlays have not been profitable.

When the probability is between 30% and 40%, we note that higher range overlays are indeed very profitable. One can suggest a minimum 25% of perhaps 40% overlay for probabilities in this range, which is basically the same as what has previously been suggested.

Interesting to look at is the results for when the probability is between 40% and 50%. Higher overlays generally have a greater return despite the low sample size which is good, but results show that any bet under 10% overlay is not profitable. Previously we suggested bets only when the overlay is 25% or above for this range, but it seems that a minimum of 10% or even 15% to be conservative is more accurate.

I am thinking of changing the suggested bets to be as follows based on the above information:

Prob 50%: min 5% overlay

Prob 40%-50%: min 15% overlay

Prob 30%-40%: min 25% overlay

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Sign up to the Sportpunter Tenns Model by 31/12/09 to recieve a free Sportpunter Polo shirt and free entry, along with myself, into day 1 of the Australian Tennis Open.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Similar Posts

  • |

    NBL Season 2012/13 set to start this friday.

    The NBL (Australian basketball) starts this Friday, and for the 7th season in a row, Sportpunter will be providing predictions. No doubt it is one of our best models, and we also believe it is one of the weakest markets out there that we can exploit. In 6 years that we have been providing suggested…

    Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • |

    ATP Injury analysis

    In previous articles we have looked at how well the new upgraded ATP model has done against certain probabilties and overlays. This analysis can be found linked on the right hand side of this page: http://www.sportpunter.com/sports/tennis/ However another interesting piece of information is how well the model goes based on our injury ratings. Sportpunter’s tennis…

    Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • |

    Upgraded WTA Model

    Sportpunter have released their upgraded WTA tennis model with good results dating back to the start of 2009. Whilst the old model hasn’t had the greatest of runs, especially since mid last year, the new model has shown significant improvements. What’s more, we’ve also eliminated the “Federer factor”. That’s right, the “Federer factor” (shortly to…

    Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Tennis Analysis 2009 – Part 6

    When looking at the ATP analysis for the favourites, the data is shown below with a brief discussion following: Here one sees good profits amongst all groups. From 2.1% ROI in the 90%-100% range, to 8% ROI in the 80-90% range. There is little to be concerned of here. One may note that when the…

    Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • |

    NBL 2014/15 analysis

    The NBL, or Australian Basketball starts this Friday, and hopefully we will achieve the same success as we have in the past. As our betting history shows, we have made 4.1% ROI betting h2h from 779 bets in 8 years. But better than h2h betting, is the line betting which has made 15.3% ROI in…

    Related Posts with Thumbnails

6 Comments

  1. Excellent stuff thanks Jon
    On the basis of those stats I think maybe I’ve been limiting my profits a bit by asking for too high an overlay
    I like the look of what you are suggesting
    Let’s hope 2010 delivers what we have come to expect from psst years
    I’ll be interested to see if the WTA analysis demonstrates similar characteristics

  2. Very useful analysis and I hopw you do the same for WTA. But it looks like when you do those in-depth 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% prob analysis you are using the overall numbers without SP rules. Cant you do them with SP rules instead? A lot of the bad bets on dogs are sorted out by the SP rules so I would like to see in depth low prob analysis with SP rules.

  3. WTA analysis is coming today. As for the 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% margins, these are based on all bets. This is to see what the minimum overlay should be within these areas. SP rules already has designated min overlays, so that is what the analysis is trying to do, to determine what these should be in these areas.

  4. I see your point. How about a break down of the higher probs like 50-60% 60-70% and so on? Couldn’t that be interesting?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.