<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: College Basketball Totals Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/02/college-basketball-totals-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/02/college-basketball-totals-analysis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: plsmove</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/02/college-basketball-totals-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>plsmove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=1113#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Lets say that something (like injury you mentioned Jon) happens that model can&#039;t include. As sharps are more popular in NCAAB, we can expect them to move odds opposite our direction. Model shows greater overound but we can expect this to be false. I think that 25 cap is very good option. 

Thanks for analysis, i love them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets say that something (like injury you mentioned Jon) happens that model can&#8217;t include. As sharps are more popular in NCAAB, we can expect them to move odds opposite our direction. Model shows greater overound but we can expect this to be false. I think that 25 cap is very good option. </p>
<p>Thanks for analysis, i love them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

