<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soccer totals analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/01/soccer-totals-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/01/soccer-totals-analysis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rimo</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/01/soccer-totals-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=1013#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Are you going to make all bets analysis (not only these live) ? 
As i understand past analysis with betting only overlays &gt;17.5% is ok to be profitable enought (10%).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you going to make all bets analysis (not only these live) ?<br />
As i understand past analysis with betting only overlays &gt;17.5% is ok to be profitable enought (10%).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sportpunter</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/01/soccer-totals-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>sportpunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=1013#comment-160</guid>
		<description>yes I agree with you Hareeba, good chance that it is meerly just normal random variation. I dont see wy the live results should differ from those since the start of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes I agree with you Hareeba, good chance that it is meerly just normal random variation. I dont see wy the live results should differ from those since the start of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hareeba</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2010/01/soccer-totals-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Hareeba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=1013#comment-159</guid>
		<description>As is frequently the case such analysis leaves me scratching my noggin!
The previous analysis for Overs with 17.5%+ overlays (2325 bets) returned a very healthy 13% profit.
Adding this &#039;live&#039; analysis of just 139 bets would make that now a total of 2514 bets for a profit of 11.9% - still very healthy!
I note the strike rate for the latter sample was only 46% as compared with 49.5% previously.
Why would you not be inclined at this stage to simply think this is normal random variation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is frequently the case such analysis leaves me scratching my noggin!<br />
The previous analysis for Overs with 17.5%+ overlays (2325 bets) returned a very healthy 13% profit.<br />
Adding this &#8216;live&#8217; analysis of just 139 bets would make that now a total of 2514 bets for a profit of 11.9% &#8211; still very healthy!<br />
I note the strike rate for the latter sample was only 46% as compared with 49.5% previously.<br />
Why would you not be inclined at this stage to simply think this is normal random variation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

