<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tennis Analysis 2009 – Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bovina</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Bovina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=951#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jon. Looking forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jon. Looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sportpunter</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>sportpunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=951#comment-135</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure it could Bovina. I shall post them after the WTA today, so tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure it could Bovina. I shall post them after the WTA today, so tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bovina</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Bovina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=951#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I see your point. How about a break down of the higher probs like 50-60% 60-70% and so on? Couldn&#039;t that be interesting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point. How about a break down of the higher probs like 50-60% 60-70% and so on? Couldn&#8217;t that be interesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sportpunter</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>sportpunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=951#comment-132</guid>
		<description>WTA analysis is coming today. As for the 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% margins, these are based on all bets. This is to see what the minimum overlay should be within these areas. SP rules already has designated min overlays, so that is what the analysis is trying to do, to determine what these should be in these areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTA analysis is coming today. As for the 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% margins, these are based on all bets. This is to see what the minimum overlay should be within these areas. SP rules already has designated min overlays, so that is what the analysis is trying to do, to determine what these should be in these areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bovina</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Bovina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=951#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Very useful analysis and I hopw you do the same for WTA. But it looks like when you do those in-depth 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% prob analysis you are using the overall numbers without SP rules. Cant you do them with SP rules instead? A lot of the bad bets on dogs are sorted out by the SP rules so I would like to see in depth low prob analysis with SP rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful analysis and I hopw you do the same for WTA. But it looks like when you do those in-depth 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% prob analysis you are using the overall numbers without SP rules. Cant you do them with SP rules instead? A lot of the bad bets on dogs are sorted out by the SP rules so I would like to see in depth low prob analysis with SP rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hareeba</title>
		<link>http://www.sportpunter.com/2009/12/tennis-analysis-2009-%e2%80%93-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Hareeba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportpunter.com/?p=951#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Excellent stuff thanks Jon
On the basis of those stats I think maybe I&#039;ve been limiting my profits a bit by asking for too high an overlay
I like the look of what you are suggesting
Let&#039;s hope 2010 delivers what we have come to expect from psst years
I&#039;ll be interested to see if the WTA analysis demonstrates similar characteristics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff thanks Jon<br />
On the basis of those stats I think maybe I&#8217;ve been limiting my profits a bit by asking for too high an overlay<br />
I like the look of what you are suggesting<br />
Let&#8217;s hope 2010 delivers what we have come to expect from psst years<br />
I&#8217;ll be interested to see if the WTA analysis demonstrates similar characteristics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

